Poster Session B   |   7:00am Expo - Hall A & C   |   Poster ID #399

Expanding the Impact of the Evidence-Based Salud En Mis Manos (SEMM) Intervention: Evaluation of the Telephone-Based SEMM Education Component

Program:
Prevention
Category:
Primary Prevention
FDA Status:
Not Applicable
CPRIT Grant:
Cancer Site(s):
Breast, Cervix, HPV-related
Authors:
Lara Savas
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Erika Figueroa-Solis
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Emily Adlparvar
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Margaret Goetz
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Sharon Coan
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Introduction

Hispanic women have lower breast and cervical (B&C) cancer screening and HPV vaccination completion rates compared with non-Hispanic Black and White women in Texas. We developed Salud en Mis Manos (SEMM), a community-based community health worker (CHW)-delivered behavioral intervention (education in-person or by telephone followed by navigation support) to help women overcome complex barriers to cancer screening and HPV vaccination services. In a previous randomized trial, the program was proven to effectively increase B&C cancer screening among medically underserved Latinas. To reach women with barriers to participating in the in-person education session, we developed and evaluated telephone-based education delivery. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the new education delivery strategy’s effect and reach among medically underserved Latinas.

Methods

From 2016 to 2019, CHWs completed B&C cancer screening and HPV vaccination needs assessments among Latinas (21-74 years) and enrolled women identified as overdue for a mammogram, cervical screening, and/or HPV vaccination. A subgroup consented to participate in a one-group pretest-post-test embedded study to examine the increase in mammogram, cervical screening, and HPV vaccination at nine months follow-up. We also compared reach and proportion screened among women who participated in the CHW-delivered in-person education compared with telephone-based education.

Results

CHWs assessed 8,138 women to determine B&C screening and/or HPV vaccination needs and delivered the SEMM education to 2,506 women in-person and to 1,466 women by telephone. Among 1,439 women included in the embedded study, 522 (36%) participated in SEMM in-person education and 81% continued with telephone navigation. Among women who had barriers to in-person participation, 602 (42%) were offered and received the education by telephone, and 88% of this group continued with navigation support. 315 (22%) women enrolled in the embedded study did not continue to participate in the SEMM program. Among women receiving in-person versus telephone-based education, respectively, 41% and 32% completed a mammogram, 49% and 38% completed a Pap screening, and 30% and 17% initiated HPV vaccination. Additionally, 22% of women enrolled in the embedded study did not participate in SEMM. Among non-participants, 14% received a mammogram, 16% completed a Pap screening, and 2% completed an HPV vaccine at follow-up.

Conclusion

Providing the telephone-based education alternative method for women with barriers to attending the in-person SEMM education increased program reach. While screening and vaccination rates were slightly lower among those receiving the education by telephone, providing telephone-based education increased the overall program impact. Current work is focused on strengthening the effect and reach of telephone-based education to further improve program impact.