Poster Session A   |   11:45am Expo - Hall A & C   |   Poster ID #199

Low GD2 expression as a mechanism of resistance to chemoimmunotherapy with dinutuximab

Program:
Academic Research
Category:
Tumor Biology
FDA Status:
Not Applicable
CPRIT Grant:
Cancer Site(s):
Brain and Nervous System
Authors:
Michelle Keyel
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Nighat Noureen
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Heather Davidson
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Adriana Estrada
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Meredith S Irwin
University of Toronto
Michael D Hogarty
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Patrick Reynolds
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Introduction

Chemoimmunotherapy with anti-GD2 antibodies is used for treating progressive disease (PD) neuroblastoma and is being evaluated with induction chemotherapy. While most neuroblastomas express GD2, low or negative GD2-expressing neuroblastomas occur and may not benefit from anti-GD2 therapy. We sought to determine the relationship between GD2 expression and response to chemoimmunotherapy in patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and to determine the frequency of low GD2 expression in neuroblastoma patients. 

Methods

We quantified dinutuximab binding to neuroblastoma cells in marrow by multi-color flow cytometry, gating out CD45+ cells and gating on cells positive for the non-GD2 neuroblastoma antibody HSAN (binds to 100% of neuroblastomas) to define % positive and median fluorescence intensity (MFI). We assessed 93 bone marrow (68 pretherapy, 25 at PD), 9 tumor, and 12 blood samples from neuroblastoma patients on Children’s Oncology Group protocol ANBL00B1. Event-free survival (EFS) was assessed for subcutaneous PDXs in nu/nu mice treated with 15 mg/kg temozolomide (TMZ) + irinotecan 7.5 mg/kg (IRN) (days 1-5 and 21-25) +/- 15 mg/kg  dinutuximab (days 2, 4, 22, 24).

Results

Based on % positive and intensity of dinutuximab binding we defined four groups of patient samples: high, intermediate, low, and very low dinutuximab binding. GD2 expression was very low in 3% pretherapy and 11% PD patient samples, and low in 20% pretherapy and 39% PD samples. We assessed activity of TMZ/IRN +/- dinutuximab in neuroblastoma PDXs (3 PD, 1 established pretherapy). In COG-N-480x (pre-therapy PDX, high GD2 expression) dinutuximab increased 300-day EFS to 100% vs 20% with TMZ/IRN (p=0.04). In COG-N-452x (intermediate GD2 expression) dinutuximab increased 300-day EFS to 50% vs. 0% for TMZ/IRN (p=0.01). Dinutuximab did not enhance TMZ/IRN activity in COG-N-519x (very low GD2) or Felix PDX (low GD2).

Conclusion

Low GD2 expression occurs in neuroblastoma. Neuroblastoma PDXs in nu/nu mice provide a preclinical model to assess antibody activity when combined with chemotherapy. In > 10% of patient marrow samples analyzed, dinutuximab binding was comparable to levels seen in PDX’s that did not benefit from dinutuximab. Quantifying GD2 expression by flow cytometry is a potential biomarker of activity for dinutuximab in patients treated with anti-GD2 based chemoimmunotherapy.