Poster Session B   |   7:00am Expo - Hall A & C   |   Poster ID #137

Utilizing Project ECHO to Support Management of Cancer Survivors in a Primary Care Setting

Program:
Academic Research
Category:
Survivorship Research and Supportive Care
FDA Status:
Not Applicable
CPRIT Grant:
Cancer Site(s):
Colorectal, Lung and Bronchus, Breast, Prostate
Authors:
Katherine Gilmore
The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Kathy Carpenter
The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Lance Johnson
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Charles Amos
The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Nancy Nguyen-Vu
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Lewis Foxhall
The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Ronda Hartman
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Julie Bortolotti
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Thomas Murphy
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Maria Alma Rodriguez
The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Introduction

Clinical training for primary care providers (PCPs) regarding the management of cancer survivors is limited. Building on work from a prior CPRIT project, we are implementing a 2-year Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes)-based, tele-mentoring curriculum to increase self-efficacy among interdisciplinary care team members of a family medicine practice. This project is a collaboration between the UT MD Anderson Cancer Center and the UT Physicians Bayshore Family Practice clinic as part of the UTH-MDA Population Health Initiative.

Methods

Participants, including family medicine physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, social workers, and community health workers, attended monthly MD Anderson-led survivorship tele-mentoring sessions. During each session a brief didactic lecture by an oncology expert was presented followed by patient case discussions. Topics for lectures were generated by survey with family medicine providers. A survey was distributed six months into the program to assess attendees’ knowledge and confidence in series content. Here we report data on feasibility of implementation and satisfaction with content and knowledge objectives. 

Results

From July 2022 – June 2023 we hosted 11 ECHO sessions with average attendance of 33 participants. A total of 329 participants claimed 110 CME/CE credits and 82 ethics credits for the content. Respondents to evaluation (N=14) indicated improvement in both knowledge and confidence level from attending the series (50% with high/very high confidence before compared with 93% after for each item). Majority of respondents plan to make practice changes as a result of the series (= 65%). Top barriers (identified as substantial) to implementing change were insurance/financial, time management, and  institutional/organizational.

Conclusion

ECHO can be an effective model to providing ongoing tele-mentoring support and increase provider confidence and knowledge in delivering comprehensive, high-quality survivorship care. Further work is needed to explore the perceived barriers to implementing this type of care in a primary care setting and interventions developed to facilitate clinical adoption.